Review



graphs generated using originpro 2018c version 9.5.1.195  (OriginLab corp)

 
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 90
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    OriginLab corp graphs generated using originpro 2018c version 9.5.1.195
    Graphs Generated Using Originpro 2018c Version 9.5.1.195, supplied by OriginLab corp, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/graphs generated using originpro 2018c version 9.5.1.195/product/OriginLab corp
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    graphs generated using originpro 2018c version 9.5.1.195 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    graphs generated using originpro 2018c version 9.5.1.195  (OriginLab corp)
    90
    OriginLab corp graphs generated using originpro 2018c version 9.5.1.195
    Graphs Generated Using Originpro 2018c Version 9.5.1.195, supplied by OriginLab corp, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/graphs generated using originpro 2018c version 9.5.1.195/product/OriginLab corp
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    graphs generated using originpro 2018c version 9.5.1.195 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    graphs generated by originpro 2018c version 9.5.1.195  (OriginLab corp)
    90
    OriginLab corp graphs generated by originpro 2018c version 9.5.1.195
    Graphs Generated By Originpro 2018c Version 9.5.1.195, supplied by OriginLab corp, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/graphs generated by originpro 2018c version 9.5.1.195/product/OriginLab corp
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    graphs generated by originpro 2018c version 9.5.1.195 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    version originpro 2018c  (OriginLab corp)
    90
    OriginLab corp version originpro 2018c
    ROC curve of Crispr method. ( a ) ROC curve in Group 1. The value of AUC was 0.939 (95% CI 0.900–0.975); the threshold of relative fluorescence value was 425; the sensitivity, specificity and consistency rate was 91.4%, 95.7% and 93.1%, respectively. ( b ) ROC curve in Group 2. The value of AUC was 0.938 (95% CI 0.893–0.983); the threshold of relative fluorescence value was 525; the sensitivity, specificity and consistency rate was 96.1%, 89.7% and 92.0%, respectively (link: https://www.originlab.com/ , version OriginPro <t>2018C).</t>
    Version Originpro 2018c, supplied by OriginLab corp, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/version originpro 2018c/product/OriginLab corp
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    version originpro 2018c - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    originpro 2018c version  (OriginLab corp)
    90
    OriginLab corp originpro 2018c version
    ROC curve of Crispr method. ( a ) ROC curve in Group 1. The value of AUC was 0.939 (95% CI 0.900–0.975); the threshold of relative fluorescence value was 425; the sensitivity, specificity and consistency rate was 91.4%, 95.7% and 93.1%, respectively. ( b ) ROC curve in Group 2. The value of AUC was 0.938 (95% CI 0.893–0.983); the threshold of relative fluorescence value was 525; the sensitivity, specificity and consistency rate was 96.1%, 89.7% and 92.0%, respectively (link: https://www.originlab.com/ , version OriginPro <t>2018C).</t>
    Originpro 2018c Version, supplied by OriginLab corp, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/originpro 2018c version/product/OriginLab corp
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    originpro 2018c version - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    originpro, version 2018c  (OriginLab corp)
    90
    OriginLab corp originpro, version 2018c
    ROC curve of Crispr method. ( a ) ROC curve in Group 1. The value of AUC was 0.939 (95% CI 0.900–0.975); the threshold of relative fluorescence value was 425; the sensitivity, specificity and consistency rate was 91.4%, 95.7% and 93.1%, respectively. ( b ) ROC curve in Group 2. The value of AUC was 0.938 (95% CI 0.893–0.983); the threshold of relative fluorescence value was 525; the sensitivity, specificity and consistency rate was 96.1%, 89.7% and 92.0%, respectively (link: https://www.originlab.com/ , version OriginPro <t>2018C).</t>
    Originpro, Version 2018c, supplied by OriginLab corp, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/originpro, version 2018c/product/OriginLab corp
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    originpro, version 2018c - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    ROC curve of Crispr method. ( a ) ROC curve in Group 1. The value of AUC was 0.939 (95% CI 0.900–0.975); the threshold of relative fluorescence value was 425; the sensitivity, specificity and consistency rate was 91.4%, 95.7% and 93.1%, respectively. ( b ) ROC curve in Group 2. The value of AUC was 0.938 (95% CI 0.893–0.983); the threshold of relative fluorescence value was 525; the sensitivity, specificity and consistency rate was 96.1%, 89.7% and 92.0%, respectively (link: https://www.originlab.com/ , version OriginPro 2018C).

    Journal: Scientific Reports

    Article Title: Rapid detection of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 mutation status in glioma based on Crispr-Cas12a

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32957-y

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ROC curve of Crispr method. ( a ) ROC curve in Group 1. The value of AUC was 0.939 (95% CI 0.900–0.975); the threshold of relative fluorescence value was 425; the sensitivity, specificity and consistency rate was 91.4%, 95.7% and 93.1%, respectively. ( b ) ROC curve in Group 2. The value of AUC was 0.938 (95% CI 0.893–0.983); the threshold of relative fluorescence value was 525; the sensitivity, specificity and consistency rate was 96.1%, 89.7% and 92.0%, respectively (link: https://www.originlab.com/ , version OriginPro 2018C).

    Article Snippet: The value of AUC was 0.938 (95% CI 0.893–0.983); the threshold of relative fluorescence value was 525; the sensitivity, specificity and consistency rate was 96.1%, 89.7% and 92.0%, respectively (link: https://www.originlab.com/ , version OriginPro 2018C).

    Techniques: CRISPR, Fluorescence

    Scatter diagram of relative fluorescent value. ( a ) The relative fluorescent value of all samples in Group 1. No.10, No.11 and No.15 IDH1-wt samples had high relative fluorescent value, while No.8 and No.32 IDH1-R132H samples had low relative fluorescent value, which was not consistent with the gold standard. ( b ) The relative fluorescent value of all samples in Group 2. There was a significant difference between the relative fluorescent value of IDH1-wt and IDH1-R132H. No.13 and No.14 IDH1-wt samples and No.12 IDH1-R132H samples present abnormal relative fluorescent value. Fortunately, such errors were limited and tolerable (link: https://www.originlab.com/ , version OriginPro 2018C).

    Journal: Scientific Reports

    Article Title: Rapid detection of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 mutation status in glioma based on Crispr-Cas12a

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32957-y

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Scatter diagram of relative fluorescent value. ( a ) The relative fluorescent value of all samples in Group 1. No.10, No.11 and No.15 IDH1-wt samples had high relative fluorescent value, while No.8 and No.32 IDH1-R132H samples had low relative fluorescent value, which was not consistent with the gold standard. ( b ) The relative fluorescent value of all samples in Group 2. There was a significant difference between the relative fluorescent value of IDH1-wt and IDH1-R132H. No.13 and No.14 IDH1-wt samples and No.12 IDH1-R132H samples present abnormal relative fluorescent value. Fortunately, such errors were limited and tolerable (link: https://www.originlab.com/ , version OriginPro 2018C).

    Article Snippet: The value of AUC was 0.938 (95% CI 0.893–0.983); the threshold of relative fluorescence value was 525; the sensitivity, specificity and consistency rate was 96.1%, 89.7% and 92.0%, respectively (link: https://www.originlab.com/ , version OriginPro 2018C).

    Techniques: